Task Status
Task Status API
Task status loaded
Current Task Status
I found 28 tracked action or revisit items in the current window. 11 build tasks are dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane, waiting for actual build progress. 5 items are ready for your review. Nothing is flagged as stalled or failed right now. No revisit items are open.
Tracked Tasks
2. Marty wants Codex to evaluate the STRACE framework for optimizing long-horizon agents by improving analysis of execution traces.
3. Marty clarifies he wants GPT-Live transcripts to automatically update Marty Pattern, Gen Pattern, and Relationship Pattern evaluators.
4. Marty wants to evaluate GPT-Live for Gen OS, focusing on car brief improvements and cognitive engine integration.
5. Marty wants to send the "Introducing GPT-Live" item to Codex. Codex should evaluate if the GPT-Live model of delegating complex tasks to a background model while maintaining conversation can improve Gen OS, particularly for stage_manager car brief usage and background task orchestration.
6. Marty wants to send the "Remember When It Matters: Proactive Memory Agent for Long-Horizon Agents" item to Codex as a priority. Codex should evaluate how this proactive memory agent could prevent "behavioral state decay" in long-horizon tasks and enhance agent coordination, memory, and workflow architecture in Gen OS and the upcoming Book Publishing Engine.
7. Marty wants Codex to evaluate "Workflow as Knowledge: Semantic Persistence for LLM-Mediated Workflows." Codex should analyze if representing workflow definitions, instances, context snapshots, and dependency relations as persistent knowledge objects could improve Gen OS agent coordination, memory, or workflow architecture.
8. Marty wants Codex to evaluate "ChatGPT Work." Codex should analyze if its agent capabilities (action across apps/files, project persistence) are parallel to Gen OS agent architecture or if they could enhance Gen OS, particularly in agent coordination, memory, or workflow.
9. Marty wants to evaluate the "Show HN: Build Rules for Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex" item. Codex should evaluate whether these build rules can improve Gen OS, Marty, Gen, or the Marty/Gen workflow, and if they improve surfaces like Gen Memory, Brain Organs, or Codex Engine.
10. Marty wants Codex to evaluate the Microsoft agent infrastructure story for insights applicable to Gen OS memory and architecture.
11. Marty wants Codex to investigate and fix the 20-minute auto-cutoff issue with the Gemini Flash voice agent in the car brief.
12. TechCrunch framed AI murder-planning questions as a live test of model safety thresholds.
Next: Open Gen thread request after mandatory Gen Memory boot, relevant resurrection packet read, optional deep research, and Marty/Gen/us pattern synthesis.
13. Marty wants to send the finding about letting Fable/Opus use their own judgment (e.g., on testing) to Codex for evaluation.
Next: Ready for Marty review.
14. Marty wants Codex to evaluate the 'Own the Loop' article and the concept of owning a portable, model-agnostic agent harness, comparing it against vendor-native options for future Gen OS architecture.
Next: Ready for Marty review.
15. Marty wants Codex to evaluate the 'Closing the Verification Loop' article and the Compound Engineering plugin to see how it could close the loop for Codex tasks and whether it's a fit for the Gen OS build flow.
Next: Ready for Marty review.
16. Send context on the OpenAI Macro Evals for Agentic Systems cookbook example to Codex for architectural evaluation and research. Codex should determine if whole-workflow testing (macro evals) is applicable to stabilizing Gen OS loops (intake, research, routing, work order, handoff, proof, live verification) or publishing workflows, and if so, produce a plan, architecture, and coding roadmap for Marty.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
17. Send context on the OpenAI Testing Agent Skills Systematically with Evals blog post to Codex for architectural evaluation and research. Codex should determine if systematic skill testing with repeatable eval cases is applicable to stabilizing Gen OS agents (Codex, Boxes, Gen, etc.) or publishing workflows, and if so, produce a plan, architecture, and coding roadmap for Marty.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
18. Send context on the ULTRAFEEDBACK scalable feedback paper to Codex for architectural evaluation.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
19. Marty wants Codex to evaluate the Hermes 45-minute walkthrough, focusing on how its orchestration patterns could improve Gen OS's chief of staff functionality, rather than compiling the Hermes model itself.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
20. Investigate and implement deduplication for stories or ideas in the Brain Brief to prevent repetition.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
21. Investigate and fix the audio cutoff issue where both Car Brief and Brain Brief disconnect after approximately 20 minutes. Determine if it is a Gemini limit or a repairable error.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
22. Marty wants to evaluate SEW (Self-Evolving Agentic Workflows) for the Codex Engine. Codex should research how to use feedback from stalled builds, missing artifacts, repeated rollback failures, and vague work orders to automatically improve future workflow behavior, aiming to eliminate aggravating, repetitive failures across different tasks. Codex must define the smallest safe self-evolving loop that requires approval rather than making automatic production changes.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
23. Marty wants to evaluate Langfuse's concept of trace-rich iteration for Gen OS. Codex should determine how execution traces and completion receipts from Gen and Codex tasks can be automatically captured and converted into structured evaluation datasets and updated Gen/Marty/Relationship pattern guidance, treating past interactions as fuel for automation improvements rather than just static logs.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
24. Marty wants to evaluate the EvoAgentX paper on self-evolving agent ecosystems to see if its concepts for coordination, evaluation, and iterative capability growth can improve Gen OS memory, routing, build coordination, or general workflow. Codex should evaluate whether it helps Marty's work, research relevant architecture, and produce either a work order or a clear no-build rationale.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
25. Marty wants to build a system for assembling portable context assets, based on the NLW idea.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
26. Marty wants to turn the 'personal benchmark/eval portfolio' idea from NLW into a Codex task for Gen OS.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
27. Marty wants to capture the advanced pattern of turning context portfolios into MCP servers from AI Daily Brief for Gen OS planning.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
28. Marty wants to capture the advanced pattern of architecting agent loops (not micromanaged prompts) from AI Daily Brief for Gen OS planning.
Next: This has been dispatched to the GitHub/Codex pickup lane; waiting for actual build progress or PR evidence.
Ready For Review
1. Marty wants to send the finding about letting Fable/Opus use their own judgment (e.g., on testing) to Codex for evaluation.
Codex reviewed Simon Willison's July 3, 2026 note about letting Fable/Opus use judgment for testing and model delegation. Recommendation: no production change yet; fold it into future Gen OS harness/eval policy as bounded judgment plus explicit proof receipts.
Next: Marty/Codex Work review. If approved later, fold the bounded-judgment proof rubric into the Gen OS harness/eval proposal, not directly into live production.
2. Marty wants Codex to evaluate the 'Own the Loop' article and the concept of owning a portable, model-agnostic agent harness, comparing it against vendor-native options for future Gen OS architecture.
The model is rented power; the loop is where Gen OS compounds. Keep Codex and Claude-style tools as strong executors, but own the task packets, traces, proof matrices, evals, promotion rules, and rollback boundaries.
Next: Marty/Codex Work should review whether to authorize an additive genos_harness_manifest_v0 ownership-gap pilot. Do not contact Boxes or start implementation from this review alone.
3. Marty wants Codex to evaluate the 'Closing the Verification Loop' article and the Compound Engineering plugin to see how it could close the loop for Codex tasks and whether it's a fit for the Gen OS build flow.
The article's core idea is useful: Codex tasks should prove claims with real downstream checks, then preserve the evidence and any unresolved residue. I recommend a small Gen OS-specific pilot template, not a production plugin rollout.
Next: Marty or Codex Work should approve or reject the proposed small pilot. If approved, build a local verification-loop template/harness for one low-risk Codex review task before any plugin rollout.
4. Marty wants to build a system for assembling portable context assets, based on the NLW idea.
Codex verified the portable-context idea and translated it into a Gen OS-specific proposal. The recommendation reuses current canonical sources, compiles only job-relevant context, and explicitly protects private memory, credentials, review-first authority, Drive truth, and downstream proof boundaries.
Next: Marty/Codex Work should decide whether to approve a local two-pack pilot for session_boot and task_handoff. Do not start implementation, expose an MCP server, write memory, deploy, or contact Boxes from this review alone.
5. Marty wants to turn the 'personal benchmark/eval portfolio' idea from NLW into a Codex task for Gen OS.
Codex verified NLW's benchmark idea and translated it into a Gen OS-specific proposal. The recommendation is a local artifact-first pilot that replays important real tasks so new models, prompts, skills, and harnesses can be compared honestly without touching production.
Next: Marty/Codex Work should decide whether to approve a local 10-12 case artifact-first pilot under the existing harness/eval direction. Do not start implementation or contact Boxes from this review alone.
Revisit Items
No revisit items returned.
Simple server-rendered page for the car app button.